ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2022 | Volume
: 11
| Issue : 2 | Page : 37-43 |
|
Effectiveness of a home-based cardiovascular disease prevention program during the COVID-19 pandemic
Priya Chockalingam1, Vaishnav Natarajan1, Tharani Sekar1, Rajaram Anantharaman2, Meeranghani Mohamed Yusuf3, Sengottuvelu Gunasekaran3, Pradeep G Nayar4, V Chockalingam5
1 Department of Preventive Cardiology, Cardiac Wellness Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 2 Department of Cardiology, ACCiST Centre, Kauvery Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 3 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Apollo Main Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 4 Department of Cardiology, Fortis Malar Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 5 Department of Cardiology, Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Correspondence Address:
PhD Priya Chockalingam MBBS, MRCPCH, PhD, Cardiac Wellness Institute, No. 21, 5th Avenue, Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090, Tamil Nadu India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcpc.jcpc_53_21
|
|
Purpose: Home-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention (HBPP) and cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) programs which occupied a small proportion of the overall Preventive Cardiology work in the past have become mainstream during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of a home-based CVD prevention program implemented during the pandemic in India. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on prepandemic and pandemic enrollees. Health behavior, CVD risk factors, physical and mental component score (PCS, MCS) from SF-12 questionnaire, body mass index (BMI), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and clinical and biochemical parameters were assessed. A multidisciplinary team consisting of Physician, Physiotherapist, Dietician, and Counseling Psychologist provided the program using telehealth platforms. Results: Of the 66 subjects (55 ± 13 years, 73% male), 17 (26%) enrolled prepandemic and 49 (74%) enrolled during pandemic, 28 (42%) were HBPP, and 38 (58%) were HBCR participants. Majority of the subjects (n = 51, 77%) with significantly more HBCR than HBPP participants harbored 4 or more risk factors (P = 0.04). In the 60 (91%) program completers, BMI, 6MWD, PCS, and MCS had improved significantly. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoproteins had improved significantly in affected subjects. Completely home-based participants (n = 44, 67%) who never had any in-person contact with the team during the program also showed significant improvement. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Comprehensive home-based CVD prevention programs are effective in improving anthropometric, clinical, biochemical, and psychosocial parameters, are a safe alternative to conventional programs, and could potentially become the standard-of-care in the postpandemic era. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
|
|
Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 504 | | Printed | 18 | | Emailed | 0 | | PDF Downloaded | 79 | | Comments | [Add] | |
|

|